Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4 bytes removed ,  10:01, 26 February 2011
no edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:  
A great number of inventors claim they have built a perpetual motion machine, but none of them succeeded in proving this. The field of perpetual motion research is also haunted by a fair share of impostors. These persons will often avoid the term perpetual motion and rather describe their devices as 'converters'.
 
A great number of inventors claim they have built a perpetual motion machine, but none of them succeeded in proving this. The field of perpetual motion research is also haunted by a fair share of impostors. These persons will often avoid the term perpetual motion and rather describe their devices as 'converters'.
   −
Such a device, if working, will be inconsistent with today's knowledge of physics, especially with the law of energy conservation and Noether's theorem.
+
Such a device, if working, will be inconsistent with today's knowledge of physics, especially with the principle of energy conservation and Noether's theorem.
    
==Classes of Perpetual Motion Devices==
 
==Classes of Perpetual Motion Devices==
 
[[image:pmleonardodavinci.jpg|PM according to Leonardo da Vinci|left|thumb]]
 
[[image:pmleonardodavinci.jpg|PM according to Leonardo da Vinci|left|thumb]]
 
[[image:BesslerRad.jpg|PM Bessler Wheel|200px|thumb]]
 
[[image:BesslerRad.jpg|PM Bessler Wheel|200px|thumb]]
From a theoretical point of view, these machines are classified into three categories based on which principle of thermodynamics they violate:
+
From a theoretical point of view, these machines are classified into three categories based on which law of thermodynamics they violate:
   −
*Perpetual motion device of the first kind: This machine would show an efficiency of more than 100% (PM supporters will also call it 'overunity'). Such a device will be in violation of the first principle of thermodynamics, that of energy conservation, as it would produce energy from nothing.  
+
*Perpetual motion device of the first kind: This machine would show an efficiency of more than 100% (PM supporters will also call it 'overunity'). Such a device will be in violation of the first law of thermodynamics, the principle of energy conservation, as it would produce energy from nothing.  
*Perpetual Motion device of the second kind: This machine will work cyclically and and will take the energy necessary from a heat reservoir. Such a device will be in violation of the second principle of thermodynamics, since the total conversion of work into heat happens to be irreversible. Heat pumps therefore  may not be seen as a second category PM.
+
*Perpetual Motion device of the second kind: This machine will work cyclically and and will take the energy necessary from a heat reservoir. Such a device will be in violation of the second law of thermodynamics, since the total conversion of work into heat happens to be irreversible. Heat pumps therefore  may not be seen as a second category PM.
 
*Perpetual Motion device of the third kind: A machine that runs indefinitely without doing any work. The idea is that, if friction is completely removed, such a machine might run forever. And while it is impossible to achieve, it is however possible to come pretty close. Such devices have actually useful appliances e.g in the construction of flywheels.
 
*Perpetual Motion device of the third kind: A machine that runs indefinitely without doing any work. The idea is that, if friction is completely removed, such a machine might run forever. And while it is impossible to achieve, it is however possible to come pretty close. Such devices have actually useful appliances e.g in the construction of flywheels.
  
editor, reviewer
547

edits

Navigation menu