Occam's Razor - Revision history

WikiSysop at 19:26, 14 October 2012

2012-10-14T19:26:14Z

Heimdall: +Cat

2011-06-13T16:57:11Z

+Cat

Heimdall: OtherLang DE

2011-03-10T22:01:51Z

OtherLang DE

Halbmond at 18:28, 26 February 2011

2011-02-26T18:28:30Z

Halbmond at 18:27, 26 February 2011

2011-02-26T18:27:05Z

Heimdall: English version

2011-02-26T12:54:56Z

English version

New page

[[image:ockham.jpg|thumb]]
'''Occam's razor''' (also Ockham's razor, novacula Occami) is a scientific principle, which is attributed to the scotish logician and Franciscan friar Father William d'Okham (1285 - 1349) but is indeed far older. The principle can even be found in the works of Aristotle (384–322 BC) (Charlesworth 1956). It was named after William of Ockham in the 19th century, even if it was never explicitly used by him, but implicit in his writings.

The philosoph Johannes Clauberg wrote 1654: 'Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem'' or ''sine necessitate'': "entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity", which became one of the best known descriptions of the principle.

The term Occam's razor for this minimalistic approach was coined in 1852 by the Scottish metaphysician Sir William Hamilton, 9th Baronet (1788 – 1856)

==The minimalistic approach in science==
The principle of Occam's razor is often described incorrectly as "the simplest explanation is most likely the correct one". A more correct explanation would be: "We should tend towards simpler theories (see justifications section below) until we have to trade some simplicity for increased explanatory power". The simplest available theory is sometimes a less accurate explanation.

It still advises a minimalistic approach to science and logic. A hypothesis with less exceptions can be tested easier and it is easier to falsify it than a complex explanation. We know from experience that more often than not the theory that requires more complicated machinations is wrong. Until proved otherwise, the more complex theory competing with a simpler explanation should be put on the back burner, but not thrown onto the trash heap of history until proven false.<ref>[http://www.skepdic.com/occam.html Skeptic's dictionary on Occam's Razor]</ref>

==See also==
*[[Inverted Occam's Razor]]

==References==
<references/>
[[category:Science]]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 *[[Inverted Occam's Razor]]
-{{OtherLang|ge=Ockhams Rasiermesser|en=Occam's Razor}}
+{{OtherLang|ge=Ockhams Rasiermesser|en=Occam's Razor|fr=Rasoir d’Occam}}
 ==References==

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 13 June 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:
	<references/>		<references/>
	[[category:Science]]		[[category:Science]]
		+	[[category:Abbreviation/Definition]]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 The principle of Occam's razor is often described incorrectly as "the simplest explanation is most likely the correct one". A more correct explanation will be: "We should tend towards simpler theories until we have to replace simplicity for explicability". The most simple theory sometimes is less precise.
-Ockham's razor, however, advises a minimalist approach to science and logic. A hypothesis with less exceptions can be tested more easily and is easier to falsify than a more complex explanation. We know from experience that more often than not a theory requiring a more complicated mechanism will be wrong. Until proved otherwise, the more complex theory competing with a simpler explanation should be put on hold, but not be dismissed altogether.<ref>[http://www.skepdic.com/occam.html Skeptic's dictionary on Occam's Razor]</ref>
+Ockham's razor, however, advises a minimalist approach to science and logic. A hypothesis with less exceptions can be tested more easily and is easier to falsify than a more complex explanation. We know from experience that more often than not a theory requiring a more complicated mechanism will be wrong. Until proven otherwise, the more complex theory competing with a simpler explanation should be put on hold, but not be dismissed altogether.<ref>[http://www.skepdic.com/occam.html Skeptic's dictionary on Occam's Razor]</ref>
 ==See also==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[image:ockham.jpg|thumb]]
-'''Occam's razor''' (also Ockham's razor, novacula Occami) is a scientific principle, which is attributed to the scotish logician and Franciscan friar Father William d'Okham (1285 - 1349) but is indeed far older. The principle can even be found in the works of Aristotle (384–322 BC) (Charlesworth 1956). It was named after William of Ockham in the 19th century, even if it was never explicitly used by him, but implicit in his writings.
+'''Occam's razor''' (also Ockham's razor, novacula Occami) is a scientific principle which is attributed to the Scottish logician and Franciscan friar Father William d'Okham (1285 - 1349) but is indeed far older. The principle can actually be found in the works of Aristotle (384–322 BC) (Charlesworth 1956). It was named after William of Ockham in the 19th century, although if it was never explicitly phrased by him, but is implicit in his writings.
-The philosoph Johannes Clauberg wrote 1654: 'Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem'' or ''sine necessitate'': "entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity", which became one of the best known descriptions of the principle.
+The philosopher Johannes Clauberg wrote in 1654: 'Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem'' or ''sine necessitate'': "Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity" which became one of the best known descriptions of the principle.
-The term Occam's razor for this minimalistic approach was coined in 1852 by the Scottish metaphysician Sir William Hamilton, 9th Baronet (1788 – 1856)
+The term Occam's razor for this minimalist approach was coined in 1852 by the Scottish metaphysician Sir William Hamilton, 9th Baronet (1788 – 1856).
-==The minimalistic approach in science==
+==The minimalist approach in science==
-The principle of Occam's razor is often described incorrectly as "the simplest explanation is most likely the correct one". A more correct explanation would be: "We should tend towards simpler theories (see justifications section below) until we have to trade some simplicity for increased explanatory power". The simplest available theory is sometimes a less accurate explanation.
+The principle of Occam's razor is often described incorrectly as "the simplest explanation is most likely the correct one". A more correct explanation will be: "We should tend towards simpler theories until we have to replace simplicity for explicability". The most simple theory sometimes is less precise.
-It still advises a minimalistic approach to science and logic. A hypothesis with less exceptions can be tested easier and it is easier to falsify it than a complex explanation. We know from experience that more often than not the theory that requires more complicated machinations is wrong. Until proved otherwise, the more complex theory competing with a simpler explanation should be put on the back burner, but not thrown onto the trash heap of history until proven false.<ref>[http://www.skepdic.com/occam.html Skeptic's dictionary on Occam's Razor]</ref>
+Ockham's razor, however, advises a minimalist approach to science and logic. A hypothesis with less exceptions can be tested more easily and is easier to falsify than a more complex explanation. We know from experience that more often than not a theory requiring a more complicated mechanism will be wrong. Until proved otherwise, the more complex theory competing with a simpler explanation should be put on hold, but not be dismissed altogether.<ref>[http://www.skepdic.com/occam.html Skeptic's dictionary on Occam's Razor]</ref>
 ==See also==