Änderungen

Eine Gruppe von Autoren aus Slovenien befasste sich ebenfalls mit dem Funktionsprinz und kommt zum gleichen Ergebnis:

Eine Gruppe von Autoren aus Slovenien befasste sich ebenfalls mit dem Funktionsprinz und kommt zum gleichen Ergebnis:

:''..Polycontrast Interference Photography

:''..Polycontrast Interference Photography<br>Another approach, known as Polycontrast Interference Photography (PIP), was introduced in late 1980s by a British inventor Harry Oldfield. ... The method itself is simple. PIP shows levels of brightness in the picture coded with artificial contrast colours. When a digital camera takes an image, the image includes pixels of various intensities of red (R), green (G) and blue (B) channels, which are combined in a certain real-like colour. Then this method converts RGB colours to grayscale, thus getting indexed palette of 256 shades of gray, with 0 being black and 255 being white. Each pixel has an index, which corresponds to its real brightness value. This palette is then replaced by a prepared palette, which has on same indexes different, artificially designated colours, which are grouped together according to Oldfield's system of correlating levels of brightness with levels of energy balance in organisms.<br>Although there have been some interesting results shown [ 10 ], this method is quite error prone, since little changes in object's position, ambient light and consequent shading may produce strong changes in resultant colours. Correlating these colours with an "energy balance and well-being" of a person, as his method for interpreting colours suggests, could be in many cases erroneous. It is also not always clear which light bands are results of subtle shades in an ambient and which are results of interaction of the biofield with an ambient light.<br>Figure 1 shows two images of the same hand with the same ambient lighting conditions. On the second image hand and the whole body were very slightly moved (for a few mm). There was no other change involved. This slight move resulted in change of ambient light bands. There are two sections marked on these images. Upper marked region on the first image could be misinterpreted using Oldfield's system as a health problem area, because of a darker colour area, and the lower marked region could be misinterpreted as an energy field, radiating from fingers. On the second image these regions are different and no conclusions like those from the first image could be made. These changes of person's position were very slight, bigger ones result in even more differences in resultant colours and light bands.''<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20110910161100/http://www.bion.si/DVB03/detection_biofield_ambient_light_ijs03.htm<br>mit Beispielbild</ref>

Another approach, known as Polycontrast Interference Photography (PIP), was introduced in late 1980s by a British inventor Harry Oldfield. ... The method itself is simple. PIP shows levels of brightness in the picture coded with artificial contrast colours. When a digital camera takes an image, the image includes pixels of various intensities of red (R), green (G) and blue (B) channels, which are combined in a certain real-like colour. Then this method converts RGB colours to grayscale, thus getting indexed palette of 256 shades of gray, with 0 being black and 255 being white. Each pixel has an index, which corresponds to its real brightness value. This palette is then replaced by a prepared palette, which has on same indexes different, artificially designated colours, which are grouped together according to Oldfield's system of correlating levels of brightness with levels of energy balance in organisms.<br>Although there have been some interesting results shown [ 10 ], this method is quite error prone, since little changes in object's position, ambient light and consequent shading may produce strong changes in resultant colours. Correlating these colours with an "energy balance and well-being" of a person, as his method for interpreting colours suggests, could be in many cases erroneous. It is also not always clear which light bands are results of subtle shades in an ambient and which are results of interaction of the biofield with an ambient light.<br>Figure 1 shows two images of the same hand with the same ambient lighting conditions. On the second image hand and the whole body were very slightly moved (for a few mm). There was no other change involved. This slight move resulted in change of ambient light bands. There are two sections marked on these images. Upper marked region on the first image could be misinterpreted using Oldfield's system as a health problem area, because of a darker colour area, and the lower marked region could be misinterpreted as an energy field, radiating from fingers. On the second image these regions are different and no conclusions like those from the first image could be made. These changes of person's position were very slight, bigger ones result in even more differences in resultant colours and light bands.''<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20110910161100/http://www.bion.si/DVB03/detection_biofield_ambient_light_ijs03.htm<br>mit Beispielbild</ref>

Es handelt sich daher nicht um eine (objectiv-) neutrale Erfassungsmethode. Die entstandenen Bilder können daher auch als Kunstwerke angesehen werden, und die Untersucher als Künstler.

Es handelt sich daher nicht um eine (objectiv-) neutrale Erfassungsmethode. Die entstandenen Bilder können daher auch als Kunstwerke angesehen werden, und die Untersucher als Künstler.