Änderungen

Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
Zeile 15: Zeile 15:     
==Die umstrittene Nanothermit-Studie==
 
==Die umstrittene Nanothermit-Studie==
Die Harrit-Studie wurde am 04.04.09 in der vanity-Publikation "Open Chemical Physics Journal" veröffentlicht, angeblich ohne Wissen und Zustimmung des zuständigen editor in chief, Marie-Paule Pileni. Pileni, die später zurücktrat bedauerte die Veröffentlichung mit den Worten: ''..I cannot accept that this topic is published in my journal. The article has nothing to do with physical chemistry or chemical physics, and I could well believe that there is a political viewpoint behind its publication. If anyone had asked me, I would say that the article should never have been published in this journal. Period..''
+
Die Harrit-Studie mit dem Titel ''Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe'' <ref>Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen. Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe. The Open Chemical Physics Journal, Volume 2, Seiten 7-31 (25), ISSN: 1874-4125, doi: 10.2174/1874412500902010007</ref> wurde am 04.04.09 in der vanity-Publikation "Open Chemical Physics Journal" veröffentlicht, angeblich ohne Wissen und Zustimmung des zuständigen editor in chief, Marie-Paule Pileni. Pileni, die später zurücktrat bedauerte die Veröffentlichung mit den Worten: ''..I cannot accept that this topic is published in my journal. The article has nothing to do with physical chemistry or chemical physics, and I could well believe that there is a political viewpoint behind its publication. If anyone had asked me, I would say that the article should never have been published in this journal. Period..''
 
  −
 
      
==Studienautoren==
 
==Studienautoren==
23.054

Bearbeitungen

Navigationsmenü