Änderungen

Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
42 Bytes hinzugefügt ,  12:56, 4. Jan. 2020
Zeile 45: Zeile 45:  
Diesen Unterschungen steht eine große Zahl publizierter Versuche gegenüber (darunter auch direkte Replikationsversuche oben genannter Arbeiten), die bei hochfrequenter Befeldung (sogar mit bis zu 100&nbsp;Watt/kg) keine DNA-Strangbrüche ergaben.<ref>Malyapa R. S., E. W. Ahern, et al. (1997). "Measurement of DNA damage after exposure to 2450 MHz electromagnetic radiation." Radiat. Res. 148(6): 608-617.</ref><ref>Malyapa R. S., E. W. Ahern, et al. (1997). "Measurement of DNA damage after exposure to electromagnetic radiation in the cellular phone communication frequency band (835.62 and 847.74 MHz)." Radiat Res 148(6): 618-627.</ref><ref>Malyapa R. S., E. W. Ahern, et al. (1998). "DNA damage in rat brain cells after in vivo exposure to 2450 MHz electromagnetic radiation and various methods of euthanasia." Radiat Res 149(6): 637-645.</ref><ref>Li L., K. S. Bisht, et al. (2001). "Measurement of DNA damage in mammalian cells exposed in vitro to radiofrequency fields at SARs of 3-5 W/kg." Radiat Res. 56(3): 328-332.</ref><ref>Malyapa R. S., L. Li, et al. (2001). "Measurement of DNA damage after exposure to electromagnetic radiation in the cellular phone communication frequency band (835.62 and 847.74 MHz)." Radiat Res 156(3): 328-332.</ref><ref>Vijayalaxmi, B. Z. Leal, et al. (2000). "Primary DNA damage in human blood lymphocytes exposed in vitro to 2450 MHz radiofrequency radiation." Radiat Res 153(4): 479-486.</ref><ref>McNamee J. P., P. V. Bellier, et al. (2002). "DNA damage and micronucleus induction in human leukocytes after acute in vitro exposure to a 1.9 GHz continuous-wave radiofrequency field." Radiat Res 158(4): 523-533.</ref><ref>McNamee J. P., P. V. Bellier, et al. (2002). "DNA damage in human leukocytes after acute in vitro exposure to a 1.9 GHz pulse-modulated radiofrequency field." Radiat Res 158(4): 534-537.</ref><ref>Tice R. R., G. G. Hook, et al. (2002). "Genotoxicity of radiofrequency signals. I. Investigation of DNA damage and micronuclei induction in cultured human blood cells." Bioelectromagnetics 23(2): 113-126.</ref><ref>Roti Roti J.L. (2004). "2450 MHz (CW) exposure and effects on DNA crosslinking." Radiation Research 161: 201-214.</ref><ref>Lagroye I., G. J. Hook, et al. (2004). "Measurements of alkali-labile DNA damage and protein-DNA crosslinks after 2450 MHz microwave and low-dose gamma irradiation in vitro." Radiat Res 161(2): S. 201-214.</ref><ref>McNamee J. P., P. V. Bellier, et al. (2003). "No evidence for genotoxic effects from 24 h exposure of human leukocytes to 1.9 GHz radiofrequency fields." Radiat Res 159(5): 693-697.</ref><ref>Hook, G. J., P. Zhang, et al. (2004). "Measurement of DNA damage and apoptosis in Molt-4 cells after in vitro exposure to radiofrequency radiation." Radiat Res 161(2): 193-200.</ref><ref>Hook, G. J., P. Zhang, et al. (2004). "Measurement of DNA damage and apoptosis in mammalian cells exposed to radiofrequency fields at high SAR in vitro." Radiat Res. 161: S. 193-200.</ref><ref>Miyakoshi, R. S., et al. (2002/2004). "2.4 GHz (CW) and 1.5 GHz (PDC) exposure on micronucleus formation, sister chromatid exchange, chromosome aberrations, DNA damage, and genetic mutation as well cell cycle, signal transduction, transformation and cell division." Electrical Engineering in Japan (2002) 141: 9-15, Mutation Research (2004) 541: 81-89.</ref><ref>[http://seawind-fp7.eu/uploads/SEAWIND_FINAL.pdf Sound Exposure & Risk Assessment of Wireless Network Devices - FP7-ENV-2009-1, 2013]</ref>
 
Diesen Unterschungen steht eine große Zahl publizierter Versuche gegenüber (darunter auch direkte Replikationsversuche oben genannter Arbeiten), die bei hochfrequenter Befeldung (sogar mit bis zu 100&nbsp;Watt/kg) keine DNA-Strangbrüche ergaben.<ref>Malyapa R. S., E. W. Ahern, et al. (1997). "Measurement of DNA damage after exposure to 2450 MHz electromagnetic radiation." Radiat. Res. 148(6): 608-617.</ref><ref>Malyapa R. S., E. W. Ahern, et al. (1997). "Measurement of DNA damage after exposure to electromagnetic radiation in the cellular phone communication frequency band (835.62 and 847.74 MHz)." Radiat Res 148(6): 618-627.</ref><ref>Malyapa R. S., E. W. Ahern, et al. (1998). "DNA damage in rat brain cells after in vivo exposure to 2450 MHz electromagnetic radiation and various methods of euthanasia." Radiat Res 149(6): 637-645.</ref><ref>Li L., K. S. Bisht, et al. (2001). "Measurement of DNA damage in mammalian cells exposed in vitro to radiofrequency fields at SARs of 3-5 W/kg." Radiat Res. 56(3): 328-332.</ref><ref>Malyapa R. S., L. Li, et al. (2001). "Measurement of DNA damage after exposure to electromagnetic radiation in the cellular phone communication frequency band (835.62 and 847.74 MHz)." Radiat Res 156(3): 328-332.</ref><ref>Vijayalaxmi, B. Z. Leal, et al. (2000). "Primary DNA damage in human blood lymphocytes exposed in vitro to 2450 MHz radiofrequency radiation." Radiat Res 153(4): 479-486.</ref><ref>McNamee J. P., P. V. Bellier, et al. (2002). "DNA damage and micronucleus induction in human leukocytes after acute in vitro exposure to a 1.9 GHz continuous-wave radiofrequency field." Radiat Res 158(4): 523-533.</ref><ref>McNamee J. P., P. V. Bellier, et al. (2002). "DNA damage in human leukocytes after acute in vitro exposure to a 1.9 GHz pulse-modulated radiofrequency field." Radiat Res 158(4): 534-537.</ref><ref>Tice R. R., G. G. Hook, et al. (2002). "Genotoxicity of radiofrequency signals. I. Investigation of DNA damage and micronuclei induction in cultured human blood cells." Bioelectromagnetics 23(2): 113-126.</ref><ref>Roti Roti J.L. (2004). "2450 MHz (CW) exposure and effects on DNA crosslinking." Radiation Research 161: 201-214.</ref><ref>Lagroye I., G. J. Hook, et al. (2004). "Measurements of alkali-labile DNA damage and protein-DNA crosslinks after 2450 MHz microwave and low-dose gamma irradiation in vitro." Radiat Res 161(2): S. 201-214.</ref><ref>McNamee J. P., P. V. Bellier, et al. (2003). "No evidence for genotoxic effects from 24 h exposure of human leukocytes to 1.9 GHz radiofrequency fields." Radiat Res 159(5): 693-697.</ref><ref>Hook, G. J., P. Zhang, et al. (2004). "Measurement of DNA damage and apoptosis in Molt-4 cells after in vitro exposure to radiofrequency radiation." Radiat Res 161(2): 193-200.</ref><ref>Hook, G. J., P. Zhang, et al. (2004). "Measurement of DNA damage and apoptosis in mammalian cells exposed to radiofrequency fields at high SAR in vitro." Radiat Res. 161: S. 193-200.</ref><ref>Miyakoshi, R. S., et al. (2002/2004). "2.4 GHz (CW) and 1.5 GHz (PDC) exposure on micronucleus formation, sister chromatid exchange, chromosome aberrations, DNA damage, and genetic mutation as well cell cycle, signal transduction, transformation and cell division." Electrical Engineering in Japan (2002) 141: 9-15, Mutation Research (2004) 541: 81-89.</ref><ref>[http://seawind-fp7.eu/uploads/SEAWIND_FINAL.pdf Sound Exposure & Risk Assessment of Wireless Network Devices - FP7-ENV-2009-1, 2013]</ref>
   −
Laut Weltgesundheitsorganisation WHO ist die Anwendung des Mobilfunks ''„möglicherweise krebserregend“''. Dabei wird der Mobilfunk in die gleiche Kategorie (Liste 2b) eingeordnet wie beispielsweise der Konsum von Kaffee.
+
Laut Weltgesundheitsorganisation WHO ist die Anwendung des Mobilfunks ''„möglicherweise krebserregend“''. Dabei wird der Mobilfunk in die gleiche Kategorie (Liste 2b) eingeordnet wie beispielsweise der Konsum von Kaffee.<ref>https://publications.iarc.fr/69</ref>
    
==Angst und Angstmache vor Elektrosmog==
 
==Angst und Angstmache vor Elektrosmog==
81.394

Bearbeitungen

Navigationsmenü