Changes

140 bytes removed ,  15:00, 22 December 2009
no edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:  
A: Psiram is not about belief. We are not for or against any religion, but restrain ourselves to questions where there is evidence. Sometimes this brings us in conflict with certain aspects of religion, like creationism. But we know very well that not all religous folk are creationists. However, most active Psiramers are atheists, indeed. On the other hand, many religous people read our blog or consult our wiki, and we like it that way.
 
A: Psiram is not about belief. We are not for or against any religion, but restrain ourselves to questions where there is evidence. Sometimes this brings us in conflict with certain aspects of religion, like creationism. But we know very well that not all religous folk are creationists. However, most active Psiramers are atheists, indeed. On the other hand, many religous people read our blog or consult our wiki, and we like it that way.
   −
Q: Ist Psiram nicht bereits wegen Verleumdung verurteilt worden?<br>
+
Q: Isn't Psiram convicted for libel already?<br>
A: Seufz. Eine Webseite kann von einem Gericht nicht verurteilt werden. Tatsächlich ist kein Psiramer je wegen seiner Tätigkeit für Psiram verurteilt worden. Wenn jemand etwas anderes behauptet, dann soll er doch mal das Aktenzeichen sagen. Einige Schwindler, die wir erwischt haben, haben versucht uns zu verklagen. Alle diese Verfahren wurden eingestellt.
+
A: Nope. You cannot sentence a web page. No Psiramer has ever been sentenced for his work at our wiki or blog. If somebody claims otherwise, ask for a refence. Some conmen we exposed tried to sue us. All these proceedings have been suspended.
    
F: Steckt hinter Psiram nicht ein Kinderarzt aus Frankfurt?<br>
 
F: Steckt hinter Psiram nicht ein Kinderarzt aus Frankfurt?<br>
autoreview, Bureaucrats, editor, reviewer, Administrators
490

edits